Changing to F-1 Status from Temporary Protected Status (TPS)

Report

This Immigration Insights report explains the complex legal and practical considerations for individuals seeking to change from Temporary Protected Status (TPS) to F-1 student status as TPS designations face increased terminations and non-renewals. It outlines when TPS holders may study without changing status, why securing F-1 status can provide long-term protection, and the critical requirements USCIS evaluates in a change-of-status application—such as lawful admission, maintenance of status, temporary intent, and discretionary review.


20 December 2025

As a TPS holder, you may be interested in pursuing an education in the United States. It is not strictly necessary to apply for a student visa to study in the United States while holding TPS; TPS holders are permitted to study full or part-time.1 However, obtaining an F-1 visa if you intend to study full time in the United States may be wise, as it will protect you from deportation should your TPS status expire or be terminated. Fortunately, TPS beneficiaries are permitted to apply for and hold F-1 status while simultaneously maintaining TPS.

The use of TPS expanded greatly during the previous Administration, and early in 2025 there were over 1 million people on TPS. It is likely that tens or even hundreds of thousands are students, and facing losing their TPS as the current Administration is not renewing TPS designations. So, the question of changing from

TPS to an F-1 student visa is more important than ever. Many foreign student advisors have never worked with people on TPS before. They are also unable to fully advise on TPS because that is beyond their authority. Also, many immigration lawyers have not done a change of status from TPS to F-1. And last, perhaps most importantly, many USCIS officers who process changes of status to F-1 have never seen a change from TPS. This summary is offered to help explain the legal issues involved.

Change of Status

Generally, nonimmigrants may change their status to another nonimmigrant (temporary visa) classification from within the U.S. as long as they have been maintaining nonimmigrant status, and eligible for the status they seek to change to.2 – A nonimmigrant must be in status at the time of filing their application for change of to the United States.3

Maintenance of status and admission are two TPS is a humanitarian status, some people on admission. For example, let’s say a child came to

status (COS), and also have a valid “admission”

important concepts in immigration law. Since have not maintained status or have a valid the US on a B-2 tourist visa from Haiti after the earthquake in 2010. Then after the B-2 expired (usually six months), the child applies for TPS, and it is granted in 2011. The child is now Haiti is ending in February 2026. This student

full-time student at a university, and TPS for file for a change of status to F-1. There is a valid “admission” to the United States in 2010 coming to the US on tourist visa. But there is a gap in status from the end of the tourist visa to the beginning of TPS. USCIS could deny the change of status saying that the student has not continuously maintained status since admission. As discussed below, USCIS has discretion to excuse maintenance of status, but those decisions are inconsistent.

Consider also a young person from Cameroon who came to the US with her family in 2020. They flew to Brazil, and crossed the US/Mexico

border without inspection. They applied for and received TPS in 2022 when President Biden designated Cameroon for TPS. And the young person is not a university student and filed for a change of status from TPS to F1 in the summer of 2025, before TPS for Cameroon ended. She does not have an admission (she entered without inspection), and she also has not maintained status, so she is not eligible for a change of status. If she had traveled on TPS (gotten a TPS travel authorization document) in 2023, then she would have an admission, and also would have maintained status since that last admission.

As you can see, this is a complicated area of law, to exercise discretion. If a change of status from

and USCIS may make mistakes, or decide not TPS to F1 is denied, then it is worth talking to an immigration lawyer to consider a motion to reconsider or going to federal court to challenge the denial as “arbitrary and capricious” under the holders are citizens of countries subject to a that it will not process applications for

Administrative Procedure Act. Some TPS ban, and USCIS announced in December 2025 from travel ban countries – PM-602-0192-PendingApplicationsHighRiskCountries-20251202.pdf If this policy continues, TPS holders may have to go to court also in a process called “mandamus” to push USCIS to adjudicate the application.

For those who have not continuously maintained grant the change of status when 1) the delay to beyond the applicant’s control, 2) the applicant status, 3) the applicant still has temporary intent not in removal proceedings.4

status since their last entry, USCIS can still was due to extraordinary circumstances not otherwise violated the conditions of (discussed more below) , and 4) the applicant is

Specific requirements for F-1 status include showing that the student: 1) has a residence in a foreign country which they do not intend to abandon, 2) is a bona fide student seeking to pursue a full course of study, and 3) intends to stay in study. 5

United States for the primary purpose of that

F-1 students are supposed to have a long term plan to leave the United States. That is the way the US Immigration and National Act is structured – most temporary visas have this requirement. For F-1 students, this can be complicated will end up long term. Also, immigration

many 18-21 year olds do not know where they may assume that someone who has been in the US for many years will want to stay here. If the often a negative factor.

has started a green card process, that is

The best guidance we have is from the State Department, which recognizes this uncertainty. It may be helpful to quote this, or use this guidance intent:

to respond to any questions on temporary

9 FAM 402.5-5(E)(1) (U) Residence Abroad Required

(CT:VISA-2048; 08-15-2024)

  1. (U) INA 101(a)(15)(F)(i) and INA 101(a)(15)(M)(i) both require that an F-1 or M-1 applicant possess a residence in a foreign country they have no intention of abandoning. You must be satisfied that the applicant intends to depart upon completion of the approved activity; specifically, they must:
  2. (U) Have a residence abroad;
  3. (U) Have no immediate intention of
  4. (U) Intend to depart from the United

that residence; and

States upon completion of approved activities.

  1. (U) Adjudicating student visa applications differs from those of other short-term visitors in that the residence-abroad requirement should be looked at differently. Typically, students lack the strong economic and social ties of more established visa applicants, and they plan longer stays in the United States. The statute assumes that the natural circumstances of being a student do not disqualify the applicant from qualifying for a student visa. You should consider the applicant's present intent in determining visa eligibility, not United States.
  2. (U) If a student visa applicant is residing

what they might do after a lengthy stay in the

parents or guardians, they are maintaining a residence abroad if you are satisfied that the applicant has the present intent to depart the United States at the conclusion of their studies. The reason to deny a visa. In addition, the present to the country from which they hold a passport. United States upon completion of their studies.

that this intention may change is not sufficient intent to depart does not imply the need to return It means only that they must intend to leave the Given that most student visa applicants are young, they are not expected to have a long-range plan and may not be able to fully explain their plans at the conclusion of their studies. You must be satisfied when adjudicating the application that the applicant possesses the present intent activities.

to depart at the conclusion of their approved

  1. (U) The fact that education or training like apparently available in their home country is applicant may legitimately seek to study in the

which the applicant plans to undertake is in itself a basis for refusing a student visa. An United States for various reasons, including a higher standard of education or training. Furthermore, the desired education or training in the applicant's homeland may be only theoretically may be already filled or reserved for others.

Ultimately, COS decisions by U.S. Citizenship discretionary, and a number of additional issues

available; openings in local schools and institutions

Immigration Services (USCIS) are arise in considering a COS application to F-1.6 One issue is that of preconceived intent. USCIS may deny a COS application if they detect that the applicant had concealed their true applying for a visa.7 Courts have held that even then rapidly enrolling in school and applying for preconceived intent.8 Therefore, applicants must to become a student when they first entered the

for entering the United States when initially

such as entering on a tourist visa, and change of status to F-1 can be evidence of show that they did not have preconceived intent

States. Another issue arises if the COS application is not approved by USCIS by the program start date listed on the I-20 form (Certificate of Eligibility for Nonimmigrant Student Status), which is required to apply for an F-1 visa. When this happens, the applicant must before the start date comes to pass; failure to do render the applicant ineligible for COS.9

If a change of status is denied, then the student

request that the program start date be deferred so would invalidate the F-1 application and

the option of booking a visa appointment at a US consulate abroad to apply for an F-1 visa stamp. That option should be considered carefully with an immigration attorney to be ready for questions on temporary intent. Also, some TPS holders are citizens of countries subject to a an approved visa.

TPS and F-1 Status

TPS is a special status which can coexist

ban and may have great difficulty in receiving

with other types of nonimmigrant status. TPS cannot be denied on the basis of existing immigration status nor are TPS holders required to relinquish their nonimmigrant status as a condition of TPS.10 An F-1 student may apply for and hold TPS in addition to their student visa status. maintaining nonimmigrant status for purposes of

Additionally, a TPS holder is considered to be COS.11 Although TPS is not an ordinary nonimmigrant visa, it still qualifies as nonimmigrant status to meet the requirements to file for COS, as detailed above. However, if TPS expires before an individual files their COS application, they are not maintaining valid nonimmigrant status, as applications ordinarily cannot be filed after an applicant’s nonimmigrant status has expired. While late applications can be excused, specific conditions must be met and the ultimate decision

by USCIS to excuse the late filing is discretionary.13 While TPS is by its very name temporary and can be terminated or expire without renewal, TPS beneficiaries receive advance notice of any termination or expiration. Initial TPS designations must announce an expiration date, and any terminations cannot go into effect for 60 days, providing ample time to file a pursue an education in the United States, they expires, in which they can apply for COS before maintaining nonimmigrant status.

For TPS beneficiaries wishing to apply simultaneously, there are some additional factors simultaneously, an individual must maintain visas.15 This will directly affect an individual’s holders are eligible for work authorization for however, are only permitted to engage in

COS application.14 If a TPS holder seeks to have a period of time before their TPS status they can no longer be considered to be

and hold both TPS and F-1 status to consider. To hold both statuses statuses and comply with the terms of both

to work while in the United States. TPS duration of their status.16 F-1 students, types of employment.17 Therefore, there are some kinds of work that are permissible under TPS but would violate F-1 status; an individual who engages in such work may jeopardize their

To sum up, TPS beneficiaries are eligible United States. Having both TPS and an F-1 visa ability to work while in the United States, but United States if they lose TPS. A TPS holder

status. 19 to apply for an F-1 visa while remaining in the simultaneously might affect the individual’s F-1 status will allow them to remain in the apply for F-1 status up until TPS expires or is terminated, but any applications filed after the loss of TPS will likely be considered invalid. Therefore, any TPS holder seeking to pursue full applying for COS as quickly as possible to

time study in the United States should consider that they do not risk falling out of status. TPS holders should also be screened by their immigration attorney for all possible immigration categories – employment, family or humanitarian – to evaluate all options.

Notes

1 NAFSA: Association of International Educators, Adviser’s Manual 360 [hereinafter NAFSA Manual], § 14.C.4, https://www.nafsa.org/professional-resources/advisers-manual-360 (last visited Dec. 13, 2025).

2 See 8 C.F.R. § 284.1(a).

3 See USCIS, Policy Manual, vol. 2, pt. A, ch. 4, § A.1.

4 8 C.F.R. § 284.1(b).

5 See INA 101(a)(15)(f).

9 FAM 402.5-5(E)(2) (U) Relationship of Education or Training Sought to Existence of Ties Abroad (CT:VISA-1970; 04-22-2024) a. (U) The fact that a student’s proposed education or training would not appear to be useful in their homeland is not a basis for refusing an F-1 or M-1 visa. This remains true even if the applicant‘s proposed course of study seems to be impractical. For example, if a student visa applicant from a developing country wishes to study nuclear engineering simply because they enjoy it, they may no more be denied a visa because there is no market for a nuclear engineer’s skills in their homeland than they may be denied a visa for the study of philosophy or Greek simply because they do not lead to a specific vocation.

6 See USCIS, Policy Manual, vol. 2, pt. A, ch. 4, § A.1.

7 USCIS, Adjudicator’s Field Manual, ch. 30, § 3(c)(3)(D) n. 2.

8 See Seihoon v. Levy , 408 F. Supp. 1208 (D. La. 1976).

9 See USCIS, Policy Manual, vol. 2, pt. A, ch. 4, § A.3.

10 See 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(5).

11 See 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(f)(4).

12 See 8 C.F.R. § 284.1(b).

13 See 8 C.F.R. § 284.1(b).

14 See 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(b)(2)-(3).

15 USCIS, Statelessness and the Ability to Work for Joint F-1/TPS 1.

16 8 U.S.C. § 1254a(a)(2).

17 See 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f)(9)-(10).

18 See USCIS, Statelessness and the Ability to Work for Joint F-1/TPS 1.

19 See USCIS, Statelessness and the Ability to Work for Joint F-1/TPS.


Topics: ,